Showing posts with label Martin Sheen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Martin Sheen. Show all posts
JUDAS AND THE BLACK MESSIAH Review
As we get older, we become more conscious of our time and the legacy we might leave. The long game no longer feels as long and therefore the implications of our actions become just as important as the ramifications. On the day of January 15th, 1990 William O'Neal was a forty-year-old man who'd been drinking with his uncle into the early-morning hours of Martin Luther King Day before running into westbound traffic on an expressway and jumping in front of a car that killed him. His death was ruled a suicide. Later that night, on PBS, the second part of the fourteen-part documentary series, Eyes on the Prize, would debut. The second part of the series chronicled the time period between the national emergence of Malcolm X in 1964 up through to the 1983 election of Harold Washington as the first African American mayor of Chicago. Included in this span of time is the year 1969 and in 1969 William O'Neal would turn twenty years-old. 1969 is also the year a twenty-one-year-old Fred Hampton, the chairman of the Illinois Chapter of the Black Panther Party, would be assassinated. Judas and the Black Messiah tells the story of how these two men were connected to one another in a tale as old as scripture as indicated by its biblical title.
The second part of the Eyes on the Prize documentary contains the only on-camera interview O'Neal ever gave. The interview itself was conducted on April 13, 1989 and in that interview O'Neal discussed his involvement with the Black Panther Party, how he was exploited by the powers that be and a puppet for the FBI who blackmailed him into infiltrating the Panthers and eventually laying out the floor plan of Hampton's apartment that would lead to the raid where law enforcement fired a total of ninety-nine shots, executing Hampton at point-blank range. The Gospel of Matthew 26:15 states that Judas committed his betrayal of Jesus in exchange for thirty pieces of silver, but as there's undoubtedly more to Judas' story and motivation than money the relationship between O'Neal and Hampton seems to have been equally as complicated. In that 1989 interview, O'Neal stated "I didn't feel like I had done anything. I didn't walk in there with guns. I didn't shoot him. FBI didn't do it. I felt somewhat like I was betrayed...I felt like, like perhaps I was on the wrong side. Yeah, yeah, I had my misgivings. I'm not going to sit here now and take the responsibility for the raid, you know, I'm not going to do that. I didn't pull the trigger. I didn't issue the warrant. I didn't put the guns in the apartment. So, I'm not going to take the responsibility for that, but I do feel like I was betrayed." O'Neal was clearly a tortured individual who was also very much in denial. According to Matthew 27:1–10, after learning that Jesus was to be crucified, Judas attempted to return the money he had been paid for his betrayal and committed suicide by hanging. Do we really blame Judas for Jesus' death though? No, of course not, just as O'Neal is only responsible for Hampton's death so far as being a young Black man in the midst of a race war who was targeted by J. Edgar Hoover's "America" as an "informant".
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Andrew Garfield,
Dennis Leary,
Emma Stone,
Martin Sheen,
Rhys Ifans,
Sally Field
Spider-Man has always been one of my favorite super heroes, but not because I was ever an avid fan of the comic books. In fact, I've never really been a comic book reader at all but instead became more enamored with the damaged teenager who is blessed with the responsibility of great power through the Saturday morning cartoons of the 90's. Why Peter Parker connected with me more than any other super hero is likely due to the same reasons he connected with every other awkward kid who found things more interesting in the classroom rather than on the basketball court. I like to think the movie studios have chosen to reboot the webslinger's franchise because it is a timeless story that follows a well worn path but does such a good job of hitting those points and driving home the message of how with great power comes great responsibility. Now, while it is obviously due to the fact that Spider-Man is a hot property and a guaranteed money maker that, if they let it sit for too long, will lose its value. I still choose to believe that somewhere in this diabolical plan to make more money someone just wants to tell a good, fun story that the teenager in all of us can relate to and fulfill those hopes we were never quite capable of. When the plans for a fourth entry with Sam Raimi, Tobey Maguire and crew fell through it didn't take long for Columbia Pictures to round up a new director and cast to reboot the franchise. While many were upset there would be a new version of a story we'd seen a mere ten years ago the reboot has been smart enough to distance itself by striking its own chord with an approach that differs from the Raimi version by adapting to a more modern audience. How much could change in a decade? Enough for this reboot to be fully justified in my humble opinion.
From what I gather this latest telling of the Spider-Man origin story is based more in the realm of the Ultimate Spider-Man comic series which coincidentally was also a reboot of the origin story of our famous protagonist. In the reinvention process Peter Parker is still a whiz kid high school student that is bitten by a spider, but it is not that of a radioactive arachnid but instead a genetically altered spider that has been part of ongoing experiments at the Oscorp corporation. You may recognize the Oscorp name from the Raimi series, but that baddie from the original is only mentioned in passing here. His company simply serves as the setting for something much more interesting to develop between the young Parker and a seasoned scientist named Dr. Curt Connors who was a partner in research with Parker's absent father. While the previous trilogy spent no time investigating Peter's parents director Marc Webb (500 Days of Summer) and his writers have integrated his parents as a crucial part of the mythology. It becomes apparent that there was something fishy going on within the walls of Oscorp and though in the latter half of the film the storyline concerning the Parker's is dismissed in favor of Spider-Man vs. Connors alter ego, the lizard, there is plenty left open for what will likely be several more films and maybe even a tie-in with those other Marvel heroes that were recently parading around New York City (wink, wink).
The Amazing Spider-Man does well to hit the marks that it needs to while not re-visiting the overly familiar aspects of the origin story. The Daily Bugle and J. Jonah Jameson, Peter as a photographer, the death of Uncle Ben, and especially Mary Jane Watson have all been either cut completely or play a minimal role in the reboot. While the likes of Martin Sheen and Sally Field serve well as Uncle Ben and Aunt May, it is relative newcomer Andrew Garfield who will be the talk of the town once everyone realizes he has not simply rehashed the Tobey Maguire role, but has re-invented it for a re-envisioned telling. Peter Parker is not necessarily a geek in the commons sense of the word, but more an outcast. He is not at the mercy of the popular girl, but is instead falling for a sweet classmate portrayed by the charming Emma Stone who, when she shares the screen with Garfield, oozes a chemistry hard to capture so naturally on screen. Like Chris Nolan's reboot of the Batman franchise, Webb has constructed a film where the person inside the mask is just as engaging as the hero. For the first hour of the film we are focused solely on the development not only of Parker and his new found powers but his developing relationship with Gwen Stacy (Stone). There relationship while critical to the plot also serves as motivation for why Peter is able to see more clearly what his purpose might be. Why he was in fact blessed with such abilities and in turn responsibilities. There is also a lovely rapport with his aunt and uncle that has some wonderful moments of non verbal communication. The way in which Webb captures these human moments is critical to the overall success of the film because at nearly two and a half hours the film could have easily slipped into several action pieces stacked on top of one another. Instead, those elements are saved for the final act while up to that point servicing the story in a way we feel really justifies the actions of those involved in that big, climactic, showdown.
While I had a few issues with the film throughout (the pacing in parts, spots of corny dialogue, and heavy reliance of CGI in the third act) I was more surprised with how much I appreciated what the makers had attempted, and for the most part, succeeded in doing here. Webb has allowed a gritty, more realistic tone to influence the look and feel of his Spider-Man world but does not resist the slight cheesiness of the actions taking place here. I mean, when it comes down to it this is about a guy in spandex who is fighting another guy that through the cliched circumstances of science experiment gone wrong turns into a large, angry reptile. The actor that is Rhys Ifans though completes a largely difficult task of making that ridiculous description of a role seem all the more plausible than it likely has any right to be. There is also some nice work here from Dennis Leary as Gwen's police captain father but it is Garfield and Stone that will make even the biggest of doubters reconsider their initial thoughts of a new Spidey so soon after the scars were healing from Raimi's disastrous third outing. In that fact also lies the reasoning I have had no issue with the idea of rebooting the series since day one. It would have been hard to come back from such a massive success of a film where the majority's response was mostly negative. It would have taken a lot to restore trust with the Spidey faithful and in the end this was likely the best choice for the future of any Spider-Man feature incarnations. I hate to even bring up the previous trilogy so much as The Amazing Spider-Man is more than capable of standing on its own two feet, but it is an inevitable comparison. Lucky for us, the quality of this reboot will likely make that comparison one that will soon fade and allow this re-telling to be treated exactly as it should be: an artist's interpretation of a story that deserves to be explored.
![]() |
| Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen), Aunt May (Sally Field) and Peter (Andrew Garfield) discuss a piece of Peter's past. |
![]() |
| Spider-Man and his new found love Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) embrace their roles in each others lives. |
![]() |
| Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans) tests out a new genetic enhancement serum on himself. |
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Andrew Garfield,
Dennis Leary,
Emma Stone,
Martin Sheen,
Rhys Ifans,
Sally Field
Spider-Man has always been one of my favorite super heroes, but not because I was ever an avid fan of the comic books. In fact, I've never really been a comic book reader at all but instead became more enamored with the damaged teenager who is blessed with the responsibility of great power through the Saturday morning cartoons of the 90's. Why Peter Parker connected with me more than any other super hero is likely due to the same reasons he connected with every other awkward kid who found things more interesting in the classroom rather than on the basketball court. I like to think the movie studios have chosen to reboot the webslinger's franchise because it is a timeless story that follows a well worn path but does such a good job of hitting those points and driving home the message of how with great power comes great responsibility. Now, while it is obviously due to the fact that Spider-Man is a hot property and a guaranteed money maker that, if they let it sit for too long, will lose its value. I still choose to believe that somewhere in this diabolical plan to make more money someone just wants to tell a good, fun story that the teenager in all of us can relate to and fulfill those hopes we were never quite capable of. When the plans for a fourth entry with Sam Raimi, Tobey Maguire and crew fell through it didn't take long for Columbia Pictures to round up a new director and cast to reboot the franchise. While many were upset there would be a new version of a story we'd seen a mere ten years ago the reboot has been smart enough to distance itself by striking its own chord with an approach that differs from the Raimi version by adapting to a more modern audience. How much could change in a decade? Enough for this reboot to be fully justified in my humble opinion.
THE WAY Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Emilio Estevez,
James Nesbitt,
Martin Sheen,
The Way
Movies are no longer about the basic story they are telling but instead marveled at because of how they convey them. What tools, characters, and instincts writers use to manipulate an age old story you have seen many times into something new and fresh. It has been taught that all stories can derive from a certain number of plots. I've heard many different numbers that can fill in that blank, but the fact of the matter is is that it doesn't matter. Because no matter how much the plot matters your audience will not be interested if you do not relate it to them in an appealing manner. It is about the journey and so in making a film about an actual journey it is likely hard to figure out how to make it fresh and interesting. This is certainly a challenge director Emilio Estevez was aware of when he began work on "The Way", a film that chronicles a fathers journey of traveling the "El camino de Santiago" from France to Spain. The story is rooted in more than just a man making a trek though, there is obviously the reasons why he is doing this and while in terms of storytelling this is of course used as a means to make us feel for the character, to relate to him, it is also the reason we want him to take a journey and ultimately why we don't mind tagging along with him. Estevez does a fine job of navigating our protagonists story while providing enough entertaining company and genuine incidents along the way to recommend this heartfelt, if not sometimes slow moving diary of a weary traveler.
Estevez enlists his real-life father Martin Sheen in the lead role of Tom Avery, a California optometrist who upon learning about the death of his son Daniel (played by Estevez in flashbacks) travels to France to collect his sons remains. Daniel was a free spirit type who dropped out of Berkley to see the world and in doing so he began the journey of the "El camino de Santiago" himself but was killed in an accident on his first day out. When Tom reaches France and in a all-around great performance by Sheen we see the reality of his sons death begin to sink in, Tom realizes he has to finish the journey for his son. It feels the only proper thing to do and the most respectable form of honoring his son. What ensues on his journey is not something just for his son who he never seemed to fully understand, but of course a kind of self-discovery that allows Tom to see and appreciate the time he's spent on earth in a different light. This is like I said, a story so ingrained in our cultural DNA but is fortunately not the most important thing about the film. No, despite "The Way" being standard fare, it is elevated by the performances and the bonds that Avery makes during his journey that allow him to come to terms with who he has become.
This may all sound a tad melodramatic and "Eat Pray Love"-ish but unlike that film our protagonists quest for something more is not rooted in their own selfishness. In fact, Tom has no desire to leave his safe and secure world of being a doctor with golf games in the afternoon. He enjoys his life, he is content, but his son has always been a kind of challenge in his life, the unconventional part of it, yearning to break out of the California bubble. Tom at first doesn't even intend to finish the walk for Daniel. This pilgrimage is the first thing in a long while to give Tom something to achieve, but the problem this enlists for the film is it lets the audience know where the film will end. So the meat of what is interesting will happen en route and while Tom collects a diverse group of traveling buddies that while having their own personal crisis on their hands, they pale in comparison to the reason Tom has chosen to take this trip. The two main problems I had with the film were the too often occurring montages set to what felt like out of place popular songs and the slight episodic feel the film began to pick up.
Tom's new found friends and their personal stories as well as their loyalty and determination to make Tom feel a part of something rather than a loner is the saving grace of the long pilgrimage and the level of acting elevates these characters to people we want to see resolve their issues. As the lone woman on the trek, Sarah (Deborah Kara Unger) says she is trying to give up smoking by the end of the trip while seeming eternally pessimistic. It is clear there is more under the hood here than smoking though and her quest for a kind of self assurance compliments Tom's the best. There is the instinctively kind Joost (Yorick van Wageningen) who is walking the path to try and lose weight in order to once again feel attractive to his wife. Finally, we have the wonderful James Nesbitt who shows up about halfway through the film as Jack, an author with writer's block who finds in Tom a story worthy of his novel. The interaction between each of them and the bonds they form is clearly the strongest aspect of the film. And while at times the movie could do with better pacing and even shave a few minutes here and there; ultimately Estevez documents the natural progression of these relationships well and produces a heartfelt if not slightly modest effort.
![]() |
| Tom Avery (Martin Sheen) gets more than he bargained for when retrieving his son's remains in France. |
![]() |
| Tom and his new found friends each have their own reasons for traveling the "El camino de Santiago". |
![]() |
| Tom, Sarah (Deborah Kara Unger), and Daniel (Emilio Estevez) reach the end of their trip together. |
THE WAY Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Emilio Estevez,
James Nesbitt,
Martin Sheen,
The Way
Movies are no longer about the basic story they are telling but instead marveled at because of how they convey them. What tools, characters, and instincts writers use to manipulate an age old story you have seen many times into something new and fresh. It has been taught that all stories can derive from a certain number of plots. I've heard many different numbers that can fill in that blank, but the fact of the matter is is that it doesn't matter. Because no matter how much the plot matters your audience will not be interested if you do not relate it to them in an appealing manner. It is about the journey and so in making a film about an actual journey it is likely hard to figure out how to make it fresh and interesting. This is certainly a challenge director Emilio Estevez was aware of when he began work on "The Way", a film that chronicles a fathers journey of traveling the "El camino de Santiago" from France to Spain. The story is rooted in more than just a man making a trek though, there is obviously the reasons why he is doing this and while in terms of storytelling this is of course used as a means to make us feel for the character, to relate to him, it is also the reason we want him to take a journey and ultimately why we don't mind tagging along with him. Estevez does a fine job of navigating our protagonists story while providing enough entertaining company and genuine incidents along the way to recommend this heartfelt, if not sometimes slow moving diary of a weary traveler.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













