The simplicity and practicality of Marvel’s approach to the introduction of this version of The Fantastic Four echoes through the story, the design of Earth 828 where the film takes place, as well as extending to the mentality of all of the characters; what is right and wrong not only seems evident to everyone but it is purposefully communicated the majority are on the same page -- tensions only arising once the nuance of Galactus’ ultimatum does and even then, humanity trusts The Fantastic Four enough to not question their methods. Director Matt Shakman began with Marvel on Wandavision, so his hiring for this retro futuristic take on the superhero family makes sense and to he, the editors, and the screenwriter’s credit the film efficiently conveys not only the context within which this team exists but the place they occupy in society and in the world.
THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS Review
FREAKY TALES Review
Neither Anna Boden nor Ryan Fleck, the writers and directors
of Freaky Tales, hail from the Oakland area where their
latest feature is set but Fleck grew-up in Berkeley and was eleven years-old in
1987 - when the film is set - indicating this is more a passion project for
Fleck and something more akin to a challenge or an insight for Boden.
Fittingly, the dynamic between the filmmakers - the homecourt advantage for
Fleck and visitor status of Boden - is imbued in the final project as Freaky
Tales fittingly straddles the line between being an underdog tale
while understanding domination is the more appealing perception in the real
world. Still, when it comes to the stories - or excuse me, tales - the
underdogs continue to stand as the more inspiring option with this line of
thought being present from the opening scroll of Boden and Fleck's latest.
Narrated by Too $hort with the film itself taking its title
from the MC's 1989 track, we're told that Oakland in '87 was "hella
wild"; the people, the culture, the music - it didn't matter - the
descriptor applied to all. $hort also informs us the reason for everything
feeling so fresh likely had something to do with a "bright green
glow" that felt akin to an electricity in the air but clarifies said
glowing green was not the same color as the city's "underdog A's
uniforms". What the "bright green glow" might symbolize or
represent is of course up to interpretation and will likely vary based on age and
relation to the time and place at the heart of the film but broadly, it's meant
to be something of a vibe incarnate; an embodiment of the attitude of Oakland
at the time that lends each of the characters in each of the featured vignettes
the swag necessary to convince us there's something a tad atypical or
"freaky" about these tales that are otherwise as old as time.
WONDER WOMAN 1984 Review
Wonder Woman 1984 is not a good movie. Unfortunately. It's not that it's soul-crushingly bad, but it's just not good and it for one reason or another feels like it's completely mistaken silly for entertaining. Absurdity for ambition. There is a wealth of good intent imbued on the project as writer/director Patty Jenkins returns to continue crafting the titular character into more of a beacon of hope than ever, but come the end of this bloated two and half hour epic it's nearly impossible to see how anyone associated with the project could have mistaken it for quality rather than recognizing the bizarre (and often times extremely cheesy) choices that were made, not to mention the incredibly preposterous nature of it all. It's almost as if the film actively goes out of its way not to necessarily make its message more convoluted, but rather like it's trying to do or say more than what is actually on its mind. In other words, it's trying to make the simple idea at its center feel more complex and therefore more sophisticated when in reality said execution simply feels perplexing. The oddity that is this Wonder Woman sequel is difficult to describe as it's still somewhat mind-blowing that Jenkins along with co-writers Geoff Johns (a former executive at DC Entertainment and a prolific writer and producer) and Dave Callaham (seasoned franchise screenwriter) submitted this screenplay to Warner Brothers with the confidence not only that it would be approved, but that it was good while it's even more confounding that Warner greenlit this $200 million experiment. All of this is difficult to come to terms with as I very much am in the bag for excessively bombastic superhero films that have a distinct point of view and while Wonder Woman 1984 is most certainly excessive and most definitely carves out where it wants to stand in the pantheon of the genre none of what transpires on screen ever feels satisfying despite the virtue of what the film is trying to convey. Its a baffling misfire, an ill-conceived attempt at looking to the past in order to enlighten us about our future, but most of all it's disappointing. With the first Wonder Woman film three years ago Jenkins crafted an equally ambitious, but more balanced film that honed in on the titular character’s optimism and slight naivety while utilizing the tangible and rather terrible world she entered as a way of highlighting those qualities. 2017's Wonder Woman found the right avenues to take in order to balance the many ambitions it hoped to accomplish with its story and characters whereas Wonder Woman 1984 crams in so many disparate ideas and goes so far out of its way in such ludicrous fashion in order to say what it wants to say that hardly any of it resonates.