Showing posts with label Vanessa Redgrave. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vanessa Redgrave. Show all posts
FOXCATCHER Review
It is difficult to fathom exactly what is going on in director Bennett Miller's Foxcatcher. The characters here are hesitant to let you into their worlds let alone their heads. As an audience member, we feel as if we're watching from the outside in on the situation at hand, never knowing the motivation of anyone as each seem to live in this world of fear. Whether it be John du Pont (Steve Carell), Mark Schultz (Channing Tatum) or even Dave Schultz (Mark Ruffalo) each possess a fear of either coming to terms with logic and the abnormalities of their situation or the fear of losing control. While the Schultz brothers are vastly different from one another they both come to understand the oddities of their circumstances at Du Pont's Foxcatcher farms. Du Pont, on the other hand, is little more than a mystery to everyone around him. Mark comes to the heir of the Du Pont family fortune early and allows the stranger things about his mentor to slip through the cracks because he shows a belief in him that no one else has ever extended. Still, despite the relationships that evolve and the dynamics that come to the surface never do we feel as if we can see why these characters are the way they are. Every line of dialogue though is used to peel back a layer of the characters and reveal something more about the backstory that has made this person who they are today. It is a technique that Miller uses most effectively allowing us to constantly crave more from the film while only giving away what it wants you to know so as to not poison the ambition of the project with unsatisfying conclusions. Whether you know what is coming or not you are riveted by the procedural nature of the film as it methodically chronicles the rise and fall of a friendship never believed to be genuine and the repercussions of the falling out of that paid for affection. Foxcatcher is a strange film filled with strange people, but it is all the more fascinating for it. It is a film I feel I could go on writing about for days and discussing at even greater length as I know each time I re-visit it I will only find new things that only highlight what I might have barely took note of before. It is a cold film, one that will at first seem off-putting for it, but the more you think about it the more the inhumanity produced by the circumstances it chronicles eats away at you.
New Teaser Trailer for FOXCATCHER
LEE DANIELS' THE BUTLER Review
Though not initially overcome with excitement for this project the good word of mouth and box office success increased my interest in the latest from director Lee Daniels. This lack of excitement doesn't come from anything more than the fact I didn't really enjoy Daniels' last effort, The Paperboy. I completely expected to be intrigued by that film as it seemed a modern film noir with plenty of genre elements at play with solid actors like John Cusack and Nicole Kidman doing interesting work, but instead it was a disjointed mess of a movie that not even the renaissance of Matthew McConaughey could bring out of the gutters. With The Butler Daniels has decided to take on a different beast entirely and tell a historical drama but from the point of view of a quiet perspective, someone who stood in the rafters and saw time pass, decisions be made and did little on his own accord to influence those decisions other than simply be who he was. That he continued to fill a subservient position for such a period of time did more to change the hearts of those he never imagined and seemingly much more than the countless sit-ins and protests that we hear about when schooled on the civil right movement. While Lee Daniels' The Butler is littered with stars, recognizable faces, names and historical events it is first and foremost the story of a man not many knew of before this film shined a light on and Forest Whitaker does a superb job of bringing that mans story to life. Add in the elements of his oldest son taking the opposite route and becoming entangled in those events we now recall with shame as played by up and comer David Oyelowo and an imperfect marriage that is only come to be appreciated in the correct way with the necessary passing of time and perspective as portrayed so effortlessly by Oprah Winfrey and you at the very least have a very engaging, very interesting film. Just because a movie is "based on a true story" (which if you do a little reading, you'll find much of this film has been manufactured) though and concerns an exceptional human being doesn't mean the film based on he or she will come out the same way. Lee Daniels' The Butler is not a great film necessarily, but it is a good one and yes, an important one.
CORIOLANUS Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Brian Cox,
Gerard Butler,
Jessica Chastain,
Ralph Fiennes,
Vanessa Redgrave
It is really amazing how intense Ralph Fiennes can get and how he can make even you as an audience member feel puny and as if you’ve crossed him. As Caius Martius Coriolanus in his directorial debut Fiennes plays the Roman general who is at one point poised for greatness and the next being opposed by the rioters in the street who were whipped up by Brutus (a brilliant James Nesbitt) and Sicinius (Paul Jesson) into not supporting him. This is a strict translation of the Shakespeare play that was believed to have been written between 1605 and 1608 and was based on the tragic life of the Roman leader of the same name. Fiennes has set his version in a more modern world where it is almost hard to decipher between the fact this is a fabrication of history made long ago and not an interpretation of what is going on over seas. Unlike all those films from a few years ago that attempted to depict America in its workings with Iraq and Iran though this is still based in Rome it simply shows how relevant and similar that what was happening then is in many ways still going on. It some ways it shows how little we have evolved from our ancestors while displaying a central character who seems so tyrannical we can only feel relieved to live in a country where the gap between the common man and those isn't as wide, or at least as wide as Coriolanus lets it be known. Like Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of 'Romeo & Juliet" this telling updates the setting while leaving the language intact. This makes it somewhat harder to follow for the modern movie-goer but Fiennes has surrounded himself with such a great supporting cast and a stellar performance himself we decipher what they are saying by the passion in their acting.
Before hearing about this film, "Coriolanus" was one of Shakespeare's plays I had not heard of. While it may be one of his lesser known pieces it certainly contains many of the elements and themes that are present in his more popular plays. Coriolanus is a general, not yet a ruler, but he denounced those in the general public and those who he feels have a lack of military service. In the tense and well choreographed opening battles of the film Coriolanus leads his men to siege the city of Corioles. They are able to force open the gates of the city, and conquer it. Even after this, Coriolanus finds his fellow general and aids in fighting the Volscian force. The commander of the Volscian army is Tullus Aufidius (Gerard Butler) a bloody enemy of Coriolanus's. They meet in combat and are only both left alive by the sheer intensity of their fight and the fact their fellow soldiers drag them away from the battle. Upon his return from battle Coriolanus is persuaded by his mother Volumnia (Vanessa Redgrave in a great performance) to run for Consul which he is usually hesitant to do, but decides to give it a try on his mothers suggestion. Coriolanus also returns to a wife, Virgilia (Jessica Chastain) and a son. In his attempt to win a place on the consul he easily wins over his peers on the Roman council but when it appears he has also won over the commoners is that moment Brutus and Sicinius turn the tide and have Coriolanus exiled instead. The way in which Fiennes has translated this to modern day works for the majority of the film, but it was in this scene that it felt the most unnatural. That it could not simply be spoken for a man of his stature to be exiled but more would have to go into it, a formal hearing at the least rather than a talk show discussion.
Fiennes knows how to take your attention off such aspects though as he delivers Shakespeare's words with such violent vigor that when he speaks such lines that translate as, "it is he who banishes Rome from his presence." We realize the level at which he sees himself and the betrayal he no doubt feels from everyone around him. In seeking revenge on the city he fought for that has outcast him he seeks out Aufidius and offers to let Aufidius kill him in order to spite the country that banished him. Butler has, since his breakout "300" role chosen hits and misses to elevate his career but in 2011 seemed to re-evaluate his choices and takes a turn not only for the more credible here but with a limited amount of screen time turns in a performance that elicits all of the correct characteristics we should feel for Aufidius. He is moved by Coriolanus's plight and honored to fight alongside the great general, they embrace Coriolanus, and allow him to lead a new assault on his former city. It ends up being a tale of vengeance that goes unfulfilled but it is the way with which Fiennes approaches the material that makes it so much more than watching a bunch of good actors recite old English. The handy cam that invades each characters space as if literally trying to get inside their head allows those not able to keep up with the language an alternative way to understand the story and the conflict that is going on on screen. Fiennes, as I mentioned earlier, also has the knowledge to fill his cast with capable actors that can translate this material as if it were natural. Both Redgrave as the domineering mother and the always fantastic Chastain give performances that create a subliminal dynamic of why Coriolanus has become the man he is and what he could be. Brian Cox should also be noted as giving a stellar performance as Menenius, the only man in Coriolanus's corner with some of the juiciest lines. This combination of tragedy and gore with the elegance of Shakespearean language creates a relevant message with an age old tale.
The best thing about "Coriolanus" though is that it feels right. It feels like it fits and for being the first project Fiennes took on as a director it feels exceptionally grand. He relies sometimes a little too heavily on the news highlights to relate the main story points to those in the audience who may feel a little lost, but that is understandable. He has created an overall tone though that feels like something Shakespeare himself would love and feels represents his story correctly. Even if you cannot understand the language all the time it consistently has an electric tone. There is something urgent about it, something that helps us understand the theme and meanings Shakespeare was trying to point out in a world that suffers many of the same problems. A leader who is raised to believe he is of a special breed, a fascist that has the nerve to be so easily influenced by a mother that can bend him any which way she pleases. It is so engaging dramatically I was left wonder why more of Shakespeare's plays are not attempted to be modernized and translated to the big screen. It is a concept rich with possibilities and as "Coriolanus" shows great possible outcomes. Though it was only in limited release here in the U.S. and will be making its way to the rental shelves no doubt sooner than it should this is a visually and dramatically arresting drama that deserves to be seen and serves as a great jumping off point for Fiennes in his directing career. I can only wonder what his next project might be and hope with great anticipation that it is as fulfilling as his first.
![]() |
| Coriolanus (Ralph Fiennes, center) is surrounded by his family and Roman council members as he is recognized for his bravery. |
![]() |
| Gerard Butler as Tullus Aufidius. |
![]() |
| Coriolanus is persuaded by his mother Volumnia (Vanessa Redgrave) to stop his plan to attack Rome. |
CORIOLANUS Review
By
Vandy Price
Labels:
Brian Cox,
Gerard Butler,
Jessica Chastain,
Ralph Fiennes,
Vanessa Redgrave
It is really amazing how intense Ralph Fiennes can get and how he can make even you as an audience member feel puny and as if you’ve crossed him. As Caius Martius Coriolanus in his directorial debut Fiennes plays the Roman general who is at one point poised for greatness and the next being opposed by the rioters in the street who were whipped up by Brutus (a brilliant James Nesbitt) and Sicinius (Paul Jesson) into not supporting him. This is a strict translation of the Shakespeare play that was believed to have been written between 1605 and 1608 and was based on the tragic life of the Roman leader of the same name. Fiennes has set his version in a more modern world where it is almost hard to decipher between the fact this is a fabrication of history made long ago and not an interpretation of what is going on over seas. Unlike all those films from a few years ago that attempted to depict America in its workings with Iraq and Iran though this is still based in Rome it simply shows how relevant and similar that what was happening then is in many ways still going on. It some ways it shows how little we have evolved from our ancestors while displaying a central character who seems so tyrannical we can only feel relieved to live in a country where the gap between the common man and those isn't as wide, or at least as wide as Coriolanus lets it be known. Like Baz Luhrmann's adaptation of 'Romeo & Juliet" this telling updates the setting while leaving the language intact. This makes it somewhat harder to follow for the modern movie-goer but Fiennes has surrounded himself with such a great supporting cast and a stellar performance himself we decipher what they are saying by the passion in their acting.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











